The same argument is used to silence the children of egg and sperm donors, if they happen to question the goodness of their conception. Are they saying that despite living happy and fulfilled lives, they would rather not exist? How ungrateful and how very sad.
The presumption in this argument is that as long as you are alive, you should be grateful and happy about the circumstances of your conception, because after all, it created you.
The absurdity of this argument becomes visible when it is transplanted into other circumstances:
- If the children of rape say they are against rape, are they saying they would rather not exist?
- Do the children of incest, pedophilia and prostitution have a duty to support incest, pedophilia and prostitution?
- Must the children of one night stands support random hookups and unprotected intercourse?
Despite the fact that it gave us life, we can recognize that the way we were created was unethical and has caused us and others great pain. We can be against hurting others in the same way that we were hurt.
It is thus no contradiction to be glad for one's life, and yet against the perpetuation of this failed experiment upon other children in the future.
3 comments:
If you're so miserable that your in the world there's a way to fix that. However I'm not sure that's ethical either. There's lots of kids in the world born to mothers who don't know who the father is and wouldn't recognize him if they were in the same room. Then there are the children who know their parents and wish they didn't. All of the people are not happy all of the time. This area is no different.
I love your blog and am so grateful someone is willing to look at these harmful pactices for what they are, and aren't just focused on adult desire at the expense of the child
excellent points!
Post a Comment