February 02, 2009

Octuplets Mother - Single and Obsessed with Babies

As the glitter begins to settle around the supposedly wonderful story of a California mother named Nadya Suleman delivering octuplets, the story behind the story is beginning to emerge.

It turns out that Suleman, at 33 years old, already has 6 children who are under the age of 7. I would congratulate her for that, if she was raising these children responsibly in a marriage with their father. But it also turns out that she is still living at home, unmarried, and she depends on her mother and father to support her and her children.

And now, Suleman's own mother has been interviewed in the media and has revealed that her daughter has never wanted to get married, has always been obsessed with having children, and has had all (now 14) children via IVF using the same sperm donor. What's more, it seems that Suleman may have been paying for the IVF procedures by "donating" her eggs. Now that's a real "Single Mom By Choice"!

I find this story an absolutely appaling example of how we have completely lost our minds in this society. Our culture supports adults in becoming so narcissistic and self-centered that the results are absurd, as in this case.

For Suleman, having children seems to be similar to collecting pets - some people have a houseful of cats or dogs, but she has decided that her hobby is to breed children. And it's easier breeding children than breeding pets! No need to enter into complicated "stud" arrangements with other pet-owning families. There's no need to seek out a father anymore and enter into real human relationships - human sperm is cheap and available online.

Suleman now has 14 children with one man. He is not held responsible for these children in any way simply because he "donated" (read: sold) his sperm away. Suleman also possibly has who knows how many children with other men, the result of her own egg "donations" - and yet she is not held responsible for these other children simply because she sold her own eggs away.

Theoretically, there is no limit to Suleman's ability to have children via sperm donation. If she won the lottery tomorrow, she could hire a harem of surrogates and keep popping out her progeny via sperm donation for as long as she could produce viable eggs. Hey, if some sperm donors are known to have produced hundreds of children, why should single mothers by choice be deprived of that delight? These days, polygamy/polyamory is not required if you want to produce dozens and dozens of your own offspring. (and hey, if you can't support them all, there's always mom and dad - or at least social assistance, which Suleman will very likely be applying for very soon. Society can't wait to pay for these progressive results of unlimited "reproductive choice").

Who's the big loser here, aside from Suleman's mom and dad? Oh yeah - it's those eight cute "bundles of delight" that are currently spending several weeks in the hospital, having been born premature and fatherless - and of course, their six siblings at home.

Unbelievable.
.

5 comments:

Oli said...

Hi Veronica

I just found your blog and I think it is fascinating.

Congratulations on your pregnancy : )

Val said...

Lucky to have found this fresh new post by you [hope your pregnancy's going well BTW] - however from the small amount of investigation I've been able to do about this sad sad case - it may actually turn out to have been "self-treatment" w/a hyperovulatory med like Clomid; no reputable fertility clinic/doctor would have transferred this many embryos into a young woman w/no problems conceiving...
http://www.alittlepregnant.com/alittlepregnant/2009/01/oh-come-on-you-had-to-know-this-post-was-coming-eventually.html#comments
[hope the hyperlink works]

Jamie Wyrick Rosa said...

I am 41 divorced twice foster parent of my nieces step mom to 3 supported many people children that they were impregnated with their eyes close by their husbands and boyfriends sperm. I have worked since 1981 according to my social security records. Paying taxes and into social security and always did odd jobs even before that, and now disabled. I have disc degenerative disease, but despite that I have always wanted to be a mom. Insurance would never pay for IVF WHICH I needed due to blocked fallopian tubes when I was younger and married, but at age 39 I working part time on SSDI for my main income became eligible for health insurance through my part time job at $550 PER MONTH which I worked and paid for thei insurance And THIS POLICY COVERED IVF. I under went ivf 3 times and had twins at age 41. I live in my own home and take care of them myself. I will not attempt to have more AND was upset about this young woman's choice to keep having kids after 6 and this doctor for transferring 6 as THE MAX i EVER transferred At 40 was 4 and the 3 different programs I cycled AT WOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED MORE. I am responsible for my own children and they will be future tax payers. I am now disappointed in society for judging all single moms by choice under this one umbrella. My children are also part of a program where they can know their donor when they turn 18 if they choose.

Anonymous said...

I stumbled onto your blog. While I don't completely agree with IVF, because I feel more people should adopt children rather than forcing themselves to have them, I think your disdainful finger pointing is horrible.

Ms. Suleman knows her sperm donor, he is a friend. I don't agree with what she did or her 14 children but it seems your biggest problem with donor sperm is that the children never know who their father is. In Ms. Suleman's case all 14 will know exactly who fathered them.

I hope you don't push your ideals onto your child. I can't imagine what it would be like to be raised by someone as close minded and crazy as you seem to be.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous wrote:
"Ms. Suleman knows her sperm donor, he is a friend."

I think it is terrible that the father of Suleman's children has intentionally side lined himself from responsibility for his children, failing to provide them with a loving supportive dad.

Funny how people think it's no big loss for those children if they just get to know their father's name. How closed/narrow minded are you? (i.e. "anonymous" poster above - yes, I'm directing this towards YOU)

"Anonymous", I find your comments offensive. It is actually you who sounds clueless, opinionated and narrow minded. I hope Veronica DOES share her ideals with her children!!!!!! Actually, I feel sorry for your children if you lead them to believe that ideals such as Veronica's are wrong and should be silenced.

That is indeed "crazy".

Oh, and Veronica, thank you for sharing your ideals. I agree with you completely.